Outokumpu

Solid Q2 22 results, with some caution going forward

04/08/22 -"The group has easily beaten its target of a higher EBITDA in Q2 vs Q1 22 This was of course based on firm prices This has enabled the company to deleverage its balance sheet further (which will ..."

PDF page sample
Pages
61
Language
English
Published on
04/08/22
Download
You may also be interested by these reports :
16/08/22
Unlike the AV universe iron ore miners, BHP reported strong results which were a big function of coal market excesses. As a result, impressive ...
12/08/22
Earlier today, Rusal reported strong H1 22 results. Despite material geo-political concerns, the management did well to capitalise on the aluminium ...
12/08/22
We have fine-tuned our estimates after the release of the H1 22 results. In short, we have upped our numbers a tick for FY22 on the back of very ...
12/08/22
Due to a combination of lower prices, much-weaker output and higher costs, Antofagasta reported weak H1 22 results. Besides the material copper price ...

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Updates Pension Risks
Target & Opinion Governance & Management
Business & Trends Graphics : Momentum
Money Making Graphics : MACD & Volumes
Debt Graphics : Sensitivities
Valuation Sector: Performance
DCF Sector: Key data
NAV/SOTP Sector: Ratios & Valorisation
Worth knowing Sector: Peers
Financials Sector: Analysis

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

AlphaValue does not have nor seek any business with companies covered in AlphaValue Research paid by subscription. As a result, investors can be confident that there is no conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of AlphaValue Research.

Corporate broking NO
Trading in corporate shares NO
Analyst ownership NO
Advising of corporate (strategy, marketing, debt, etc) NO
Research paid for by corporate NO
Provision of corporate access paid for by corporate NO
Link between and a banking entity NO
Brokerage activity at AlphaValue NO